The foundational step of this methodology involves the deployment of a centralized processing interface within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) environment. The provided visualization captures the core interface of the custom GEE application, which serves as the hub for the multi-sensor LULC validation pipeline. Within this dashboard, users can define a specific Area of Interest (AOI)—highlighted here over the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa—and configure key parameters, including temporal ranges for the acquisition of sentinel-derived products. Crucially, the interface is designed to load and compare two primary datasets simultaneously: Dynamic World (near real-time, probability-based LULC) and ESA WorldCover (10m resolution structured LULC). The contrasting classification schemes are represented by the legends on the left and right sides of the map view, which illustrate the varying definitions of ‘Built-up’ and urban areas between the two products. Establishing this visual and statistical comparison at the application level is the prerequisite for calculating the spatial disagreement threshold, or delta, that guides the subsequent merging and population estimation phases.
Category Archives: monitoring
Agricultura de precisión (II). APP para integración con Catastro rural en España
La convergencia entre el Big Data geoespacial y la administración pública ofrece una oportunidad sin precedentes para la optimización agronómica. La capacidad de procesamiento de Google Earth Engine (GEE), vinculada a la cartografía vectorial del Catastro rural, permite transformar las series temporales de misiones como Sentinel-2 en herramientas de diagnóstico directo sobre la parcela. Este enfoque desplaza el análisis de una observación puramente visual a una monitorización cuantitativa basada en la respuesta espectral de los cultivos. El núcleo de esta aplicación reside en la intersección geométrica de las parcelas catastrales con colecciones de imágenes multiespectrales. Mediante el uso de la API de JavaScript en GEE, se automatiza el cálculo de indicadores biofísicos críticos como el NDVI (Índice de Vegetación de Diferencia Normalizada), el NDWI (Índice de Agua de Diferencia Normalizada), el EVI (Índice de Vegetación Mejorado) y el SAVI (Índice de Vegetación Ajustado al Suelo). Estos índices no solo reflejan el vigor fotosintético, sino que permiten identificar anomalías de crecimiento, estrés hídrico o variaciones en la densidad foliar que son invisibles al ojo humano en las fases tempranas del ciclo fenológico.
Aventuras y desventuras de un geógrafo en “desarrollo”
La cartografía siempre ha sido un oficio de precisión, paciencia y criterio espacial. Durante años, el flujo de trabajo de cualquier geógrafo pasaba inevitablemente por entornos de escritorio como ArcGIS Pro o QGIS: cargar capas, ajustar simbología, exportar mapas. Herramientas sólidas, probadas, indispensables. Pero algo está cambiando.
Cada vez más, el análisis espacial ocurre en la nube, en navegadores, en entornos de código. En anteriores post habéis visto algunos test/ideas/aplicaciones que he desarrollado con Javascript Google Earth Engine, que procesa imágenes satelitales a escala planetaria sin mover un solo archivo. Deck.gl y Maplibre renderizan millones de puntos en 3D directamente en el navegador. React convierte un mapa en una aplicación interactiva con pocas líneas de código.
ESTIMATED GHSL vs INE 2025
He desarrollado este COMPARADOR DE POBLACIÓN GHSL vs PADRÓN INE 2025 en JavaScript/Google Earth Engine que cruza estimaciones satelitales de población con los datos oficiales del censo español municipio a municipio.
La herramienta permite seleccionar cualquier provincia y municipio de España, visualizar la distribución espacial de población estimada por el GHSL con el último dato oficial del INE 2025, detectando municipios con alta presión turística, despoblación real o población no registrada.
Una aplicación directa para planificación de infraestructuras, gestión de emergencias o análisis de cohesión territorial donde el padrón no refleja la ocupación real del territorio.
Flood assessment using RADAR (Sentinel1), SRTM v3+ and GHSL pop estimation in Spain
I have developed this NRT FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT monitor in GEE that merges the power of RADAR and GHSL to detect impact over POPULATIONS under any weather conditions.
You can use geospatial intelligence to quickly transform satellite data into critical decisions during climate emergencies. GIS technology driving global resilience!
¡Con R de running!
Un registro constante: más de 11 años (desde Agosto 2014 hasta hoy) con más de 1,150 sesiones documentadas. Un proyecto vital; no son solo números, es la cronología de mi disciplina. Puedo decir de nuevo que R me ha roto mis esquemas de geógrafo de ArcGIS, de Global Mapper y QGIS, ahora no todo pasa por el filtro de tener coordenadas, por ejemplo estos insights no tienen coordenadas pero son analizables y se pueden tomar conclusiones que te permiten tomar decisiones rápidas… Echemos un vistazo a mis carreras los últimos años.
R analysis for HR corporate talent management
I am a geographer by training, and my professional career has always had a predominantly geospatial focus. Having recently completed a forty-hour course in R, using RStudio and GitHub, I feel that a whole new world of analysis has opened up before me. This work represents the meeting point between my basic geographical instinct and the technical capabilities of statistical programming. It is important to emphasise that I have invented this data and model entirely, so the results have no real meaning and contain inevitable biases. Their sole purpose is to learn and demonstrate the capabilities of this language. I believe that geographical knowledge and code are interdependent, as one without the other would not function successfully. It is precisely this symbiosis that I hope will make a difference in my current job search.
Analyzing Spatial Correlation between Purchase Power Index and Gambling Stores (2)
This GIS study applies Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to investigate the spatial relationship between Purchasing Power Index (PPI) and the distribution of gambling-related retail establishments within the city of Madrid. My aim is to account for spatially varying relationships driven by local urban contexts, under the assumption that the relationship between socioeconomic conditions and the presence of gambling venues varies across urban space. My hypothesis is that the socioeconomic conditions of the urban fabric can be a breeding ground for the location of betting shops, or in other words, I am attempting to Detect Urban Vulnerability to Gambling Harm.
Mapping Something Unthinkable: Flood Risk in Madrid using Open Data
Dont get wrong if you see the IA background showing our handsome major almost showing his beautiful smile in Cibeles/Correos it’s only to get your attentions (only if you need it thou!). Flooding in urban environments is not a speculative hazard but something we can quantify. In the case of Madrid, the intersection of pretty mountainous terrain (it might surprise you there are 2000m difference between the highest spot in Madrid province, Pico Peñalara -2428m- and the Alberche river environment in some areas -430m-) and urban expansion presents a scenario of significant risk, particularly when analyzed through the lens of shared high-resolution geospatial data. This study integrates the buildings from BTN (Base Topográfica Nacional) provided by the Spanish “IGN”, the CNIG with the official flood hazard maps for a 100-year return period (T=100), published by the Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge (MITECO). The T=100 scenario is the most representative for evaluating long-term flood exposure, as it reflects events with a 1% annual probability—rare but not improbable, and certainly not negligible.
Spatial relationship between “high schools” and “betting shops” in Madrid. A first approach (1)
It is a fact that a betting shop should not be close to a secondary school. Its obvious the impact on population ranging 12-17 could be higher than in other. How near? 100m? 500m? Euclidean distance or following the street network?. In any case, if I choose for instance a range of 500m, for example, 81% of betting shops in Madrid have secondary schools within that distance (258 out of 316). Looking at it from the secondary schools’ point of view, almost 60% of secondary schools have betting shops within 500m (171/291). This is undoubtedly an issue that needs to be addressed.
Geovisualization.net 