The exercise shows how a simple SketchUp 3D volume, defined solely by its basic geometry, can be transformed into a complex architectural proposal. Starting from the initial schematic model, the system interprets proportions, levels, and shapes, and converts them into a fully developed building, complete with textures, vegetation, lighting, and an urban context
Category Archives: QC
Precision Elevation Data for Forest Giants: LiDAR vs ETH Global Canopy Height in Mata do Buçaco (Portugal)
High‑resolution elevation data underpins almost every spatial analysis we do in GIS—especially in forests where vertical structure defines habitat, biomass, wind exposure, fire behavior, hydrology, and the microclimates that sustain rare species. In rugged or densely vegetated environments, a coarse or biased elevation model propagates error everywhere: orthorectification drifts, hillshades mislead, slope/aspect misclassify, and canopy metrics saturate. The result is decisions made on blurred terrain that hides the very patterns we seek to manage. Precision elevation—derived from airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)—solves this by separating the ground from the vegetation and delivering both a bare‑earth Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and a Digital Surface Model (DSM). Subtracting DTM from DSM gives a Canopy Height Model (DHM) that captures the true vertical architecture of the forest at sub‑meter resolution.
Using Excel to calculate the RMSE for LiDAR vertical ground control points
The height accuracy of the collected LiDAR data can be verified by comparing with independently surveyed ground control points on hard, flat, open surfaces. It is essentially just calculating the height differences for all the control points and then determining the height root mean squared error (RMSE) or differences. Most LiDAR processing software have the reporting function built-in. However, plain Microsoft Excel can also do the job (except for extracting the elevation from the LiDAR data).
Geovisualization.net 